User:Purple Scissor/Sandbox/Pseudoskepticism in debate
From WikiSynergy
Occam's Razor
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
If someone says that a claim is extraordinary and therefore requires extraordinary evidence, he is making a positive claim. He thus shoulders a burden of proof to show the claim is really "extraordinary."
In a scientific context, extraordinary means that a claim Differs from well supported theory in a manner which changes some of the basic assumptions of that theory. It can also mean that a claim is unprecedented by other evidence,[1] in an area which has been rigorously investigated.
Cite error:
<ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found